Monday, February 2, 2009

Corporate Social Responsibility: Don't bite the hand that feeds you.

There have been many articles on corporate responsibility lately due to the ill judgment of the CEO’s of the U.S.’s largest companies. For instance, John Thain, the CEO for Merrill Lynch, had invested more then 1.22 million dollars in renovating his office with such luxuries as a $87,000 area rug or curtains for $28,000. Many people would consider this as a waste of money, but what is considered a waste, Thain spent $1,400 on a waste basket, therefore it can’t be considered anything but trash. The argument is how much is too much when it comes to expenses for such large companies. This type of expenditure seems reasonable if a company is brining in multi-million dollar profits, but with a forth-quarter net loss of $14.31 billion, this type of spending is anything from considerable. I don’t blame him, with an estimated income of $50 million dollars; it is really hard to gain an understanding of money when it is as available as air. One may not appreciate something that is so readily available to him.

With millions of dollars being thrown around to supply company executives with such luxuries as privet jets and exotic vacations, it is a must to remember where it all came from, the consumer. The consumer provides the capital to fund such extravagant luxuries just to find that they are paying premium for their product. Shouldn’t such luxuries be returned to the consumer? Yes! That is why corporate social responsibility or C.S.R. for short is an important property to look for when analyzing a company. CSR provides a great opportunity to give back to the precious consumers that fund their business.

But again, I don’t blame corporations that don’t believe in returning the favor of business. Capitalism is the main economic system of the United States. Capitalism brings rise to entrepreneurship due to the perusal of such lavish luxuries. Who doesn’t have a dream to make millions of dollars. I know I do. The problem is when people get to greedy to give thanks for what they have and place any additional cost to their customers rather then accepting the cost themselves. Eventually the well will dry up and so will their pocket books.

In conclusion, don’t bit the hand that feeds you. Rather make sure the relationship between the supplier and consumer offer equal benefits to ensure a lasting relationship.

15 comments:

  1. hey.. I became a follower of your blog.. If you don't mind please return the favor. Thank you!!! My blog is... http://boardofdirectorsman4701.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete
  2. Green
    I completely agree that it's time for a change on the market, but it also need to start in each every one of us.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well - if you take a look at all the Boards of public companies, you will note something in common: most board members are CEOs themselves! (or at least, held the position before).... If CEOS are defining salaries (and perks) of CEOs, why would they "cap" themselves with a "decent" salary? If they start cutting some of these perks, it sets a very undesirable precedent, don't you agree?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Another pointer: CEOs usually stay for short periods of time in their post - 5 years average... The bulk of their compensation is stock - so why not make stock prices soar when they are in charge? Forget long term planning - they want it now! So "tweaking" the numbers a bit to make a company "look" good for stockholders seem a good deed to the greedy bunch... And if anything else fails, go for those "golden parachutes"....

    ReplyDelete
  5. The latest topic be discussed is that having the CEO’s salary cuts will destroy the banking system. It stated that what would be the incentive for such qualified personal work for a capped salary of $500k when they can easily work for another corporation for a multi-million dollar salary. These banks might loose all their personal that is significant to their sustainable business. It is also stated that, if these CEO’s work hard for 3 years with their capped salary, they could in fact sell their stock options and make their millions from a regular salary. The truth is, government is just trying to make a point where it is not right for someone to make so much money, when so many others are suffering.
    As for your comment on modifying the stock price, the stock price is determined mainly from the investors into that company. With laws in place like the Sarbanes Oxley Act, which forces the company to disclose any financial reports, its really hard for companies to modify their statements. Since this only applies to banks that receive T.A.R.P. II money, government will be Overseeing this boards with great caution.
    CEO’s should receive their appropriate salary but in times where these banks are doing horrible. There salary should be revised.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Well, I DO BLAME those coorporations and CEOs. I blame them for being selfish and extremely stupid. Money doesn't make people unpreciative and wasteful. Character does. Warren Buffet is the richest man in the world but he is as frugal as frugal can be, and as honest as honest can be.

    I blame the government for being corrupt and not enforcing regulations. I blame government officials for accepting bribes and not paying their taxes themselves, but expecting everyone else to do so.

    I blame the government for not pursuing these criminals in a court of law.. WE ALL KNOW that they along with Maddoff will all end up on "house arrest" with maids to serve them and delicate foods at their table. They won't suffer any consequences, but the little guy will.

    Too bad most of us are that little guy.

    ReplyDelete
  8. In accounting there are two terms used for expenditures: they have to be both reasonable and necessary. The point is the definition of those two terms and that's where many CEOs take advantage and call whatever anything they want to buy an expenditure, making it tax deductible, but forging the stockholders' right to a credible financial statement. Causing a huge gap between the real financial condition of the firm and what is presented. Then, people invest and later the company fails, everybody looses money.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Me too Andre,I completely agree with what Alice said!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Alice, you have some very good points. Warren Buffet’s frugalness is portrayed through his position as CEO for Berkshire Hathaway. Billions have been saved for investments such as the $11billion into Swiss Re, General Electric Co, Goldman Sachs, and Harley-Davidson. Buffet has accumulated $62 billion of wealth under his name. Anyone would consider $62 billion dollar a stupid amount of money. And your worried about the CEO that makes less then 1% of Buffets wealth in a year.
    The government are not corrupt at all. I believe that it could be considered that these large corporations play a large role in government. They are given the position to provide Americans with the life’s they deserve. These large corporations have enabled us to have luxuries that the companies have provided us to make life easier and enjoyable. The US government needs to accept some of the requests of corporations due to their large contribution to our country. Everyone needs to be happy in the economic formula.
    As for Maddoff, he should be treated equal to anyone that has committed a crime and be put into jail. Even though his actions weren’t deadly they were just as harmful to society.

    ReplyDelete
  11. You have a lot of valid points and I agree with what a lot of what Alice had to say however I dont think I, myself, could pinpoint who in fact is the one to blame in the state of today's economy. It is the blame of these large corporations who have let greed overtake their social responsibilities, it's also the government who hasn't done their part in ensuring that effective regulations are in place to avoid such expeditures and it's the people themselves who have sat around for far too long just letting this all happen and not being informed of anything ACTUALLY going on.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Welcome to capitalism!
    But given the lack of common sense among fellows, things could be more moderated though…
    The problem is that the consumers only get to know about the executives "luxury extravaganza" only when companies are sinking...
    It should be signalized before, or actually, it could be somewhat prevented and the biggest part of their wages should be tied to corporate performance, otherwise makes no sense!

    ReplyDelete
  13. I'm very disappoint because the bigger CEO are the same way, big house, super cars and still invest the money, the government should do something, this guys have responsibility for the economic, they have to pay.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I agree. Accountability is the key! It’s OK to make high salaries, even if they are ridiculously high. But these people need to be accountable for what they do. The executive can make money when money is being brought in, but no one should expect the same when profits are not there.

    ReplyDelete